1.
A latent-variable study examined whether verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM) capacity measures reflect a primarily domain-general construct by testing 236 partici[...]
2004 | Text | English | Faculty and Staff Works |
2.
Individual differences in working memory capacity are related to a variety of behaviors both within and outside of the lab. Recently developed automated complex span task[...]
2012 | Text | English | Faculty and Staff Works |
3.
In two experiments, we investigated the possibility that susceptibility to proactive interference (PI) affects performance on memory span measures. We tested both younger[...]
1999 | Text | English | Faculty and Staff Works |
4.
Three experiments tested whether a modified version of the Clustered Conceptual Span task (H. J. Haarmann, E. J. Davelaar, andM. Usher, 2003), which ostensibly requires a[...]
2007 | Text | English | Faculty and Staff Works |
5.
We introduce and empirically evaluate the strategy affordance hypothesis, which holds that individual dif-ferences in strategy use will mediate the relationship between p[...]
2008 | Text | English | Faculty and Staff Works |
6.
The n-back task requires participants to decide whether each stimulus in a sequence matches the one that appeared n items ago. Although n-back has become a standard ?exec[...]
2007 | Text | English | Faculty and Staff Works |
7.
Working memory (WM) span tasks—and in particular, counting span, operation span, and reading span tasks—are widely used measures of WM capacity. Despite their popularity,[...]
2005 | Text | English | Faculty and Staff Works |